Probabil credea ca xbox-ul a facut RROD din cauza foamei.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Printable View
Probabil credea ca xbox-ul a facut RROD din cauza foamei.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Azi de 14 februarie va urez un Happy Waifu day:
http://i.minus.com/iKLXCU7oEKG8A.jpg
---------- Post added 15-02-2014 at 13:11 ----------
As avea o intrebare stiti cumva un loc de unde as putea cumpara ceva gen stilus pentru smartphone ? (In Cluj de preferabil)
Depinde cat de bun vrei sa fie stylus-ul respectiv. Un Wacom gasesti doar pe-afara. Stylus-uri "tipice" gasesti si aici Cautare stylus: 58 rezultate - PC Garage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike105X
Mersi mult Monky, nu-mi trebuie cine stie ce ma multumesc si cu unul ieftin (este mai mult pentru maicamea nu-i prea place ecranul plin de amprente :p) dar totusi vreau sa mai intreb ceva, cu stylus-ul nu prea sunt riscuri de zgariat ecranul nu ?
Nu prea... capatul este de obicei un cauciuc/plastic cauciucat. Unele stylus-uri vin chiar si cu "capete de schimb".
A da mai am o ultima intrebare, Stylus-urile sunt compatibile intre device-uri nu ? Intreb deoarece am gasit la un pret bun Asus PDA-PHONE P526 Stylus.
---------- Post added 15-02-2014 at 20:56 ----------
Never mind, am avut putin timp liber si m-am interesat, se pare ca nu este bun. Macar am invatat despre tipurile diferite de touchscreen-uri :D.
Hello.
Hey, ca o intrebare:se merita sa cumpăr un ps3 de acum încolo?eu am o mica colectie de console pe care inca le utilizez:psp ps2 x360).
In mod normal nu as avea un motiv sa nu il cumpăr, cu excepția faptului ca, fata de controllerul de xbox, cel de ps3 mi se pare cu mult mai putin comfortabil fata de cel de XB(poate ca am ramas cu ideea asta de la ps2).Marea problemă e faptul ca psn-ul va fi oprit intr-o zi, nu? De xbl am aflat ca va mai functiona cel putin 2-3 ani(pentru x360, nu X1)
, dar de psn nu am gasit nimic relevant.Totusi, se merita aceasta achizitie, pentru moment, for online gaming? Mentionez ca nu vreau in decursul următorilor 2-3 ani sa achizitionez o consola next-gen(mai astept o versiune slim- in special pentru X1 =)), ceva mai ieftin, un bundle fara kinect etc).
da.Quote:
Originally Posted by A_A_A
B-)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sol1d
De ce?as vrea cateva motive.
MP bune pe PS3 care-mi vin in minte: TLOU, KZ3, Uncharted3. Suportul PSN pentru PS3 va tot fi pentru o buna perioada de timp, consola primind oricum titluri noi, cel putin pentru moment: South Park Stick of Truth, Dark Souls2, Watch Dogs, Destiny etc.
De exemplu Destiny, un proiect imens, se bazeaza aproape exclusiv pe componenta MP => trebuie suport PSN.
Doar pentru MP? Nu mi-as lua un PS3 daca as fi in locul tau si as astepta sa am bani de un PS4 sau X1. Depinde care-ti place mai mult la exclusivitati, X1 avand avantajul Titanfall si PS4 avand Killzone-ul. Ambele au Destiny, care sper ca va fi glorios :D
Dar cum eu ma joc mai mult SP in ultima vreme PS3-ul imi este indispensabil, are un catalog imens de jocuri care oricum trebuie jucate chiar daca am si PS4. Eu nu pot juca Uncharted4, TLOU2, Assassin's Creed 15 etc. daca nu am jucat si titlurile anterioare, sa vad exact care-i treaba cu povestea, personajele etc.
Merci mult de raspuns!Nu e problema ca unele jocuri ca halo apar pe xb, pentru ca as vrea oricum sa imiQuote:
Originally Posted by sol1d
fac o colectie de console, noi, vechi, de placere, nu ca sa fac reviewuri ca ps3 e mai nu stiu cum fata de xbox.
P.S: Nu imi iau ps3 doar pentru mp.
Mai aparem si noi pe harta:
How Chuck Norris and Sylvester Stallone infiltrated communist Romania | The Verge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2VdAV0Yp_Gg
no ma
---------- Post added 19-02-2014 at 00:50 ----------
Your Strategy Guide To Life
Sursa: Valve, VAC, and trust : gamingQuote:
[confirmed: Gabe Newell]Valve, VAC, and trust
Trust is a critical part of a multiplayer game community - trust in the developer, trust in the system, and trust in the other players. Cheats are a negative sum game, where a minority benefits less than the majority is harmed.
There are a bunch of different ways to attack a trust-based system including writing a bunch of code (hacks), or through social engineering (for example convincing people that the system isn't as trustworthy as they thought it was).
For a game like Counter-Strike, there will be thousands of cheats created, several hundred of which will be actively in use at any given time. There will be around ten to twenty groups trying to make money selling cheats.
We don't usually talk about VAC (our counter-hacking hacks), because it creates more opportunities for cheaters to attack the system (through writing code or social engineering).
This time is going to be an exception.
There are a number of kernel-level paid cheats that relate to this Reddit thread. Cheat developers have a problem in getting cheaters to actually pay them for all the obvious reasons, so they start creating DRM and anti-cheat code for their cheats. These cheats phone home to a DRM server that confirms that a cheater has actually paid to use the cheat.
VAC checked for the presence of these cheats. If they were detected VAC then checked to see which cheat DRM server was being contacted. This second check was done by looking for a partial match to those (non-web) cheat DRM servers in the DNS cache. If found, then hashes of the matching DNS entries were sent to the VAC servers. The match was double checked on our servers and then that client was marked for a future ban. Less than a tenth of one percent of clients triggered the second check. 570 cheaters are being banned as a result.
Cheat versus trust is an ongoing cat-and-mouse game. New cheats are created all the time, detected, banned, and tweaked. This specific VAC test for this specific round of cheats was effective for 13 days, which is fairly typical. It is now no longer active as the cheat providers have worked around it by manipulating the DNS cache of their customers' client machines.
Kernel-level cheats are expensive to create, and they are expensive to detect. Our goal is to make them more expensive for cheaters and cheat creators than the economic benefits they can reasonably expect to gain.
There is also a social engineering side to cheating, which is to attack people's trust in the system. If "Valve is evil - look they are tracking all of the websites you visit" is an idea that gets traction, then that is to the benefit of cheaters and cheat creators. VAC is inherently a scary looking piece of software, because it is trying to be obscure, it is going after code that is trying to attack it, and it is sneaky. For most cheat developers, social engineering might be a cheaper way to attack the system than continuing the code arms race, which means that there will be more Reddit posts trying to cast VAC in a sinister light.
Our response is to make it clear what we were actually doing and why with enough transparency that people can make their own judgements as to whether or not we are trustworthy.
Q&A
1) Do we send your browsing history to Valve? No.
2) Do we care what porn sites you visit? Oh, dear god, no. My brain just melted.
3) Is Valve using its market success to go evil? I don't think so, but you have to make the call if we are trustworthy. We try really hard to earn and keep your trust.
=D>